Well, since I never did hear back from my international requests, I will have to rely on the posts of others and webpages I have explored.
By taking a look at ECE around the world, I discovered that:
1. Sadly, funding for ECE is a major issue for many countries around the world.
2. The importance of ECE is recognized in most nations worldwide.
3. ECE educators worldwide are feeling some of the frustrations experienced here in the USA.
One goal for this field would be for educators to take advantage of the ease of communication. Today, you can talk to just about anyone, anywhere. Teachers should be utilizing this to work together for the betterment of education worldwide.
I wish my classmates well on the next leg of their journey.....
Translate
Saturday, October 25, 2014
Saturday, October 18, 2014
International Contacts--Part 3
Since
I have yet to receive any type of a response from any of the international
contacts I reached out to, I have once again opted to complete the optional
assignment. This week, it is to explore the following website and share my
insights:
The
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization have a
mission similar to many of the organizations I have researched lately: providing
young children the tools and assistance they need to be healthy, strong, and
well-educated.
Unlike
many of the webpages I have explored, however, was the lack of appeals for
funding. There were no “click here to become a member” ads, no money-making
conferences: nothing but actual information.
The
next thing I noticed was that this website is not pushing their own agenda on
nations world-wide. They acknowledge that, while we know early childhood
services are vital, they also acknowledge that there is no one accepted answer
to the question “What is high quality?”
The
last thing that impressed me was the fact that this organization understands
the importance of the fact that there is only one planet, and we all have to
share it. The betterment of life for all mankind is more important than
nations.
I
must say, that I have become more than a bit discouraged over the last few
weeks. My experiences have led me to distrust educational organizations rather
than rely on them. This website was a refreshing change from my experiences of
late.
Saturday, October 11, 2014
Exploring the Head Start website...again
For this week, I am supposed to further explore the Head
Start website, although I really don’t see the point. The information is pretty
basic, and doesn’t really change all that much from week to week. The biggest
items are the upcoming 50th anniversary, requests for money, and
celebrating those organizations which give them money. In fact, of the six main
headings, four of them deal mainly in the financial end. Yes, I include
conferences under financial, because they are quite costly and make money for
Head Start. This is not to say that I don’t believe in the Head Start Program,
it’s just reporting on what I am actually reading.
Part of the assignment was to find new information which
adds to my understanding of equity and excellence in early childhood education,
as well as new trends or issues. Again, the information doesn’t really change
all that much, so there aren’t any new revelations. They do have links to
several studies, but the results are all pretty much what we already know:
early childhood education is vital to children’s development, high quality
programs give children the best chance to succeed, and so on.
Sorry, but I really just can’t find anything new or
Earth-shattering to report upon.
Saturday, October 4, 2014
Getting to Know Internation Contacts Pt 2
As I have not heard from anyone regarding my
requests for international contacts, I opted to explore the website http://developingchild.harvard.edu/index.php/activities/global_initiative/.
The Global Children’s Initiative was born out of a realization that we have an
obligation to see that all children worldwide are healthy: physically,
mentally, and developmentally.
The first thing that stuck me while reading the
website is that they base their work on what they learned while working in the
United States. I find this funny, as much of what I have read lately says that
the United States is trying to catch up to the rest of the world. The recent
battles over the Affordable Health Care Act are proof that the health system in
the U.S. is clearly not ideal, and the push for standardized testing is an
attempt to improve education to be more like other countries.
The next thing which struck me was the fact that
this Global Children’s Initiative is using the science of early childhood
development to create early childhood programs worldwide. We don’t even do that
in the United States! We IGNORE the science, and instead focus on the methods
with quickly reportable assessments.
Un Buen
Comienzo (A Good Start) is another program—this time in Chile—that resembles
the Head Start Program here in the United States. They focus on educating not
only the children, but the families as well. This is great—except that my
recent research into Head Start shows that they are so severely underfunded,
that they hit up the very people they serve and the people who work for them to
raise funds!
While I
know that the need for early childhood education and healthy development are an
important need worldwide, I find it ironic that an American University is
working on improving other countries, when our own country is so desperately in
need! I am certainly not saying that we should ignore the plights of other
countries. What I am saying is that maybe we should spend some of those
resources fixing what is wrong here before we start telling other countries how
they should be doing things.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)